Failure to Amend the PLO Covenant


Communicated by the Israel Government Press Office, January 29, 1998


Following is a clarification of 4 myths concerning the PLO Covenant:

1) Myth: The PLO fulfilled its obligation to amend the Covenant when the Palestinian National Council (PNC) voted in April 1996 to alter the document.

Fact: On September 9, 1993, in his exchange of letters with the late Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, Yasser Arafat committed himself to amending the articles in the PLO Covenant which deny Israel's right to exist or run counter to the PLO's other commitments, such as the renunciation of violence and terror.

On April 24, 1996, the Palestinian National Council (PNC) convened in Gaza and adopted a resolution concerning the Covenant by a vote of 504 to 54 with 14 abstentions. Translated from the Arabic, the text of the resolution read as follows:

The pivotal problem with the PNC resolution is that it did not change the Covenant. While the PNC declared its readiness in principle to change the document, the only practical step taken was the empowerment of a legal committee to draft a new Covenant for presentation at a future date. Since the Covenant is a legally binding document, declaring a willingness to alter it does not amount to amending it. No changes were adopted and implemented by the PNC, nor was there any specific mention of articles to be amended.

In the Note for the Record which accompanied the January 15, 1997 Hebron Protocol, the PLO reaffirmed its commitment to "Complete the process of revising the Palestinian National Charter." In agreeing to this, the PLO was admitting that it had failed to change the Covenant in the April 1996 PNC vote, otherwise there would be no need to "complete the process" of revising it.

2) Myth: Chairman Arafat's recent letters to President Bill Clinton and Prime Minister Tony Blair set the record straight regarding which articles in the Covenant were changed.

Fact: There are three problems with Chairman Arafat's recent letters concerning the PNC's April 1996 decision. First, the PNC resolution made no mention of specific articles which were being changed in the Covenant. Now, some 21 months after the PNC vote, Arafat is attempting to retroactively define the articles which the PNC members had in mind when they cast their votes.

Second, Chairman Arafat's letters to President Clinton and Prime Minister Tony Blair contradict each other. In his letter to President Clinton, Arafat listed 12 articles which had been entirely nullified (Articles 6 to 10, 15, 19 to 23, and 30) and 16 others partially nullified (Articles 1 to 5, 11 to 14, 16 to 18, 25 to 27, and 29). In his letter to Blair, Arafat listed 9 articles which had been entirely nullified (Articles 6, 10, 15, 19 to 23 and 30) and 14 others which were partially nullified (Articles 1 to 5, 13, 14, 16 to 18, 25 to 27 and 29).

Thus, Arafat asserted in his letter to Clinton that 28 articles in the Covenant had been altered, whereas in his letter to Blair he said that 23 had been changed.

Third, Arafat's letters contradict statements made shortly after the PNC vote and repeated recently by a wide variety of senior Palestinian officials. Less than a month after the PNC vote, PNC Chairman Selim Zaanoun asserted that the Covenant had been amended but said that "no specific articles" were cancelled. (An-Nahar, May 16, 1996) In an interview on January 22, 1998, Faisal Hamdi Husseini, head of the PNC's legal committee, said "The change has not yet been carried out".

The day after the PNC vote, Sufian Abu Zaidah, head of the PA's Israel desk, claimed that all 33 of the Covenant's articles had been "cancelled" and that it had been replaced by the PNC's 1988 Algiers declaration. (interview with Israel Radio, April 25, 1996) PA Planning Minister Nabil Shaath said after the vote that 16 articles had been altered while other PNC members claimed that 4, 7 or 10 articles had been changed (Jerusalem Post, May 1, 1996). Faisal Hamdi Husseini, head of the PNC's legal committee, said on May 5, 1996 that he would submit a new Covenant for approval at a later date in which 21 articles would be changed, thereby implying that none had been amended. (Jerusalem Post, May 6, 1996)

At the time of the vote, other PLO officials acknowledged the Covenant had not been changed. PLO Executive Committee member Sakhr Habash said, "the text of the charter remains as it is since it has not been amended yet. Therefore, it is frozen, not cancelled." (An-Nahar, May 5, 1996) An internal report published shortly after the PNC vote by the Research and Thought Department of Arafat's Fatah faction of the PLO contained a similar determination. The report stated, "The text of the Palestinian National Covenant remains as it was and no changes whatsoever were made to it. This has caused it to be frozen, but not annulled."

The PNC itself failed to make any mention of changing the Covenant in its closing statement. At the close of its session, on April 25, 1996, the PNC published a concluding document summarizing its activity. The statement included 19 specific resolutions and decisions on subjects ranging from Jerusalem to Israeli settlements, but contained no reference to any decision to amend the Covenant. (Al-Quds, April 26, 1996; Voice of Palestine, April 26, 1996)

3) Myth: Chairman Arafat's letters effectively complete the process of revising the Covenant.

Fact: Article 33 of the Covenant states that the only body empowered to change the document is the Palestinian National Council (PNC) and that such changes must be approved by a two-thirds majority of the PNC in a special session. Thus, Chairman Arafat's letters are insufficient. Under the procedure outlined by the Covenant itself, Arafat's letters have no legal bearing on the text of the document. The PLO's obligation to convene the PNC in order to amend the Covenant remains unfulfilled.

4) Myth: The PLO Covenant is an outdated document of no significance.

Fact: The Palestinian National Covenant is the founding charter of the PLO, delineating the organization's stated aims and goals. Its tenets are echoed daily in the rhetoric of Palestinian leaders and media. Almost all of the articles in the Covenant explicitly or implicitly deny Israel's right to exist and reject any peaceful solution to the Arab-Israeli conflict. For example, Article 19 states, "the establishment of Israel is fundamentally null and void, whatever time has elapsed " Article 22 asserts that, "the liberation of Palestine will destroy the Zionist and imperialist presence and will contribute to the establishment of peace in the Middle East ."

The Covenant also denies the existence of the Jewish people as a nation and any ties that it might have to the Land of Israel (Article 20). It declares that "armed struggle is the only way to liberate Palestine and is therefore a strategy and not tactics" (Article 9).

A document Israel submitted to the Palestinian Authority (PA) in mid-January 1998 details the necessary steps to amend the Covenant:

Stage One

a. issuance of a statement by the legal committee specifying the articles of the Covenant which were amended or annulled in accordance with the April 1996 Palestinian National Council (PNC) decision (i.e. the articles in the Covenant which are inconsistent with the Palestinian obligations in the framework of the peace process).

Stage Two

b. reconvening of the PNC to pass a new resolution which affirms the statement issued by the legal committee concerning which specific articles in the Covenant were amended or annulled.

At the same time, the Palestinian Authority must refrain from replacing the articles with other articles which contradict the agreements and/or the peace process, for such a step would be considered a failure to fulfill their obligation to amend the requisite articles in the Covenant."

To comply with their obligation, the Palestinians must amend 26 of the 33 articles in the Covenant which deny Israel's right to exist or advocate violence and terror. The articles which must be changed are: 1-15, 18-23, 25-27 29 and 30.

The Covenant's continued relevance to Palestinians was underlined by a recent article in the official PA newspaper Al-Hayat Al-Jadeeda, which said, "many in the Palestinian public still believe in the Covenant and see it as our nations' only source of authority in the current and upcoming stages of the conflict The Covenant from 'A' to 'Z' is a Palestinian document which battles the Zionists " (Al-Hayat Al-Jadeeda, October 19, 1997)

As the late Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin said in a speech to the Knesset on October 5, 1995, "the Palestinian Authority has not up until now honored its commitment to change the Palestinian Covenant I view these changes as a supreme test of the Palestinian Authority's willingness and ability, and the changes required will be an important and serious touchstone vis-a-vis the continued implementation of the agreement as a whole."


Back to index
Israel Government
Points of view

Back to
the home page of
Likoed Nederland